Izskatās, ka tas ir plašāks sinonīms "cumulative offense". Būtībā summārs pārkāpums, ko veido vai nu viena darbība, kas veido vienlaicīgi vairākus pārkāpumus vai darbību ķēde, kas veido vienu pārkāpumu. Iesaku lietot oriģinālam tuvu tulkojumu, lai palikttu abas nozīmes: sakritība laikā un sakritība pēc darbības rakstura.

Saitē garš teorētisks penteris ar visām niansēm.

In this separate opinion I use the terms “ideal concurrence” and “real concurrence”, which are well understood in civil law systems and which have been incorporated into the jurisprudence of the Tribunals. Real concurrence of offences arises when the accused commits more than one crime, either by violating the same criminalisation a number of times, or by violating a number of different criminalisations by separate acts. Apparent real concurrence may arise when a series of separate, but closely related, acts fulfil all the elements of a certain criminalisation, but are considered as a single, albeit continuing, crime. Ideal concurrence refers to the situation whereby a single act or factual situation violates more than one criminalisation. [800] Apparent ideal concurrence of offences arises when a relationship of concurrence is resolved by the application of further analytical methods.