This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
1. I sometimes receive messages sent to "ProZ.com Member" , with the company's name as the sender and not marked as '[ProZ.com mail]'. Those are bulk mailings, right?
2. Sometimes they send a message to me via normal '[ProZ.com mail]', with my own e-mail address as the recipient, but it later turns out that other translators received the exact same message.
1. I sometimes receive messages sent to "ProZ.com Member" , with the company's name as the sender and not marked as '[ProZ.com mail]'. Those are bulk mailings, right?
2. Sometimes they send a message to me via normal '[ProZ.com mail]', with my own e-mail address as the recipient, but it later turns out that other translators received the exact same message.
Problems:
#1 looks like normal mail from a company, and on a fast day it can be difficult to realize quickly enough that they may very well have sent their rush job inquiry to 100 people or be asking 100 people for CVs, documents etc. (just semi-disguised by the kind of wording that makes it look like a more personal message);
#2 can disguise a reverse auction where translators aren't told that multiple translators are being asked to provide a quotation
These are not major issues in any objective sense, but it can be a 'tangible' letdown psychologically when you discover that you've been duped.
Solutions:
For #1: First off, I think a ProZ.com tag is basically necessary. On the other hand, a label to show that the message was addressed to multiple undisclosed recipients would be helpful (especially where the wording may deceive the reader). Also disclosing the number of recipients could be helpful.
For example if it's 2-3, I probably wouldn't mind it as much, since it could just be about the ticking clock on a rush job or something else like that. But an RFQ about a specific job (as opposed to a general inquiry about qualifications and rates) with 100 recipients is something I normally wouldn't touch with a barge pole.
For #2: Perhaps detect/track the sending of identical messages to different recipients in a short time span and very quick succession? Or amend the rules to require senders to disclose that type of thing at least?
Or perhaps Staff could think of a better/smarter/more convenient way to detect and mark bulk mail and prevent disguised private tenders? ▲ Collapse
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value
Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.